- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:28:58 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Manu Sporny wrote: > Agenda > > 1) XHTML+RDFa Last Call > * Any outstanding issues? > * Target publication date? > > 2) ISSUE-52: Lightweight DataStore aligned with ECMAScript > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/52 > > 3) ISSUE-53: DataParser Upgrades > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/53 > > 4) ISSUE-54: DataSerializer > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/54 All, I've updated ISSUE-52 to include discussing whether the lightweight DataStore described would be better used to represent an RDF Graph, to all intents and purposes that (graph) is what was in mind when raising the issue, it just hadn't twigged that the name may be wrong, as discussed in recent mails. We cannot accurately define or resolve this issue without being clear on what concept we are trying to represent (graph or store). Also I've made a small correction to the IDL in ISSUE-53, if you've looked in to this in depth then you should be aware, it's a minimal correction though, parse had the arguments in the wrong order and was missing the callback. Best, Nathan
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 16:29:47 UTC