- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:49:53 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Shane, On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > I don't mind Group - but I also like "Collection". Yes, me too. As with 'property group' the distance between the term used and what the thing actually is, is very short: Mum: What's a 'property collection'? Mark: Oh, it's just a collection of properties that all apply to the same thing. Mum: Ah...I see. I knew this semantic web business wasn't that difficult. Another candidate came up when I was double-checking that the functionality defined within 'property groups' could be implemented in Python; I had forgotten that Python uses the term "dictionary" for these kinds of objects, which I also liked. 'Property collection'...'property dictionary'...'property group'...maybe we can see if people can live with any of these, and also whether they spark other suggestions. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Monday, 31 May 2010 19:50:28 UTC