- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 03:37:27 +0100
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Hi Ben, Yes...but the point I was trying to stress before is that the point they are making is that RDF is difficult to do in JSON. Whether they have criticisms of RDF per se is secondary. So unless we're prepared to tackle that, there's not much we can offer. (Sorry to be blunt amidst all the excitement...but it's *not* an RDFa issue.) Regards, Mark On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: > > Manu wrote: >> >> It's so close, seems like there is a big opportunity for both Twitter >> and the RDFa Community here... what do all of you think? > > Agreed. It *is* RDF already, except without extensibility... wait, where > have I seen this before? > > If you need help with a local visit, I'm really good at that when it comes > to Bay Area folks :) > > -Ben > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 02:38:02 UTC