- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 14:18:59 +0200
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:19:10 UTC
Just one point because you did not understand one of my remarks... On May 6, 2010, at 13:18 , Mark Birbeck wrote: > > >> That might >> cover a number of cases for RDFa, but if we really have a general concept of a store where I >> could also plug, say, a turtle parser, then this approach breaks down (because there is no >> reference to a DOM node any more...) > > I don't quite follow that, but I'm sure it will come out in our discussions. > > (I'm not sure if it's what you are talking about, but the DOM node > goes into the triple store; the add method used in Store takes a > triple plus a pointer to any object, and that will usually be the DOM > node that is in scope when the triple is generated.) > > What I meant is: the concept of a store, the parsing, the query are all general concepts that are not specific to RDFa. Ie, I could imagine something like store.parse("turtle","http://example.org/t.ttl") ie, that a Javascript application accesses an RDF file somewhere and integrates it with whatever is in the store already. After all, that is the beauty of RDF... but in this case a DOM node becomes irrelevant... Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:19:10 UTC