- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 17:54:40 -0400
- To: "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 05/03/10 17:49, Shane McCarron wrote: > We recognized this issue VERY EARLY in the RDFa deployment cycle, and we > put a warning in the errata that the direction was going to be > case-insensitivity - mostly because lots of user agents seem to lose > the case of attribute declarations when in HTML mode. I think we are > okay breaking backward compatibility on this because, to be honest, it > should never have been this way in the first place. > > However, if the group feels otherwise I think Gregg's suggested model is > excellent. I had asked Gregg to e-mail the group with this particular item since it's something that will need a proposal and a resolution from the RDFa WG. Anything that breaks backwards compatibility will require discussion. I'll try to create an ISSUE for this later tonight and get it on the Agenda in the coming weeks. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarming Goes Open Source http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/02/01/bitmunk-payswarming/
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 21:55:09 UTC