- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:30:07 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Hi Toby,
It's this one:
<> xhv:test <> .
You get the base path by creating an absolute path based on the value
in 'base'. And even if the base URI has a fragment identifier, the
fragment identifier is dropped.
I.e.,:
assert.areEqual(
absolute("http://example.net/#foo", ""),
"http://example.net/"
);
This is definitely mentioned in the RDFa 1.0 spec, although I don't
have time to look for it at the moment.
Regards,
Mark
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> So how is the following to be interpreted?
>
> <html>
> <head rel=":test" resource="">
> <base href="http://example.net/#foo" />
> </head>
> </html>
>
> I can imagine arguments in favour of:
>
> <#foo> xhv:test <> .
> <#foo> xhv:test <#foo> .
> <> xhv:test <> .
>
> I think this needs clarification; not just in RDFa 1.1, but also as an
> errata for RDFa 1.0.
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 13:30:42 UTC