- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:35:44 +0200
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
I've seen a few people ask "why not name= in the header?"; any plans to change this in 1.1? Or a nice link I can point people at that explains the reasoning? Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: corerymwamba <corey.mwamba@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:37 PM Subject: Re: Meta tags in HTML documents To: Open Graph Protocol <open-graph-protocol@googlegroups.com> On Apr 24, 2:11 am, Mark Kinsey <mkin...@facebook.com> wrote: > We based themetatags of the RDFa syntax (http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/ > REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014/#col_Metainformation), which uses 'property'. > We don't currently have any plans to support 'name'. > > While I understand the desire to produce valid HTML, we made the > design decision that simple tags were a valuable tradeoff. > It's a shame that "name" isn't supported - I can't see why "property" is simpler than "name". Can you explain? Cheers, Corey
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 08:36:18 UTC