Re: Last Call comments on RDFa Core

Just a side issue:-)

On Dec 13, 2010, at 24:13 , Harry Halpin wrote:
> 
> I'm just saying feedback from Facebook and Google seems to say that having
> "property" aim to literals and "rel" aim to URIs make as much sense as,
> Kavi puts it, having male and female genders in some languages to things
> like table. It's just convention.

As somebody who has two "own" languages, with one (Hungarian) being gender-less and the other (French) using genders: I know that the discussion does come up in France regularly about why having genders overall, and many many people regard it as a nice feature of the language that should never ever be abolished:-) Conventions are not necessarily bad:-)

Nothing to do with the original comment, of course!

Cheers

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf