- From: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:26:53 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Received on Saturday, 28 August 2010 11:26:50 UTC
2010-08-28 11:10 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: > On Aug 27, 2010, at 15:14 , Christoph LANGE wrote: > > I have a question about processing rule 8 from the latest draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-rdfa-core-20100803/), which says: > > > >> If in any of the previous steps a new subject was set to a non-null value, it is now used to provide a subject for type values; > >> One or more 'types' for the new subject can be set by using @typeof. If present, the attribute must contain one or more URIs … > > Actually, I believe that is an editorial bug. Per > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/13 > > and its resolution in > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-04-08#resolution_2 > > it is allowed to have @typeof="", yielding a (typeless) Bnode. Ie, the text should say "the attribute may contain one or more URIs" Thanks for the clarification! It's also good to know that @typeof="" is allowed now. It's still not as intuitive a name as @itemscope in HTML 5 microdata, but probably the best we can get in RDFa. Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
Received on Saturday, 28 August 2010 11:26:50 UTC