- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:40:50 +0200
- To: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Message-Id: <0F4B9052-3D32-417C-A062-176EE95CCFDB@w3.org>
(Tracker, this belongs to ISSUE-16) Guys, I explicitly copy this to Jeni, because she was the latest (not the first) to ask about this feature lately (on twitter). I wonder whether this is along the lines of what she was having in mind. I have spent some time the past few days to look at the ways I used to implement collections and containers in the previous version of pyRdfa. As a result, I came up with a fairly new design; I wonder whether something similar could be adopted. Or not; but, in any case, we do have an open issue on the subject that we have to close in one way or other... I wrote down my current design on the Wiki: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/ContainersAndCollections The design has been tested insofar as I did implement it and it works (well, I am sure there are bugs, I have not had time to make an absolutely thorough test). A general comment is that the design does _not_ aim at covering all possible usage patterns of collections or containers, but if we have something that makes the 80/20 cut (or even less) I think it is worth considering. Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 11:38:55 UTC