- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:29:30 +0200
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli, Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:22:52 +0200: > I think the RDFa working group should take such things into > consideration - some options: > > * If the browsers actually used out there are not supporting the > XHTML+RDFa DTD, then it is perhaps smart to recommend to serve such > documents with standalone="yes" - until there is such support. > * One should file bugs to make the browsers support these DTDs > * One possibly is to define DTDs which is more Polyglot Markup > compatible > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/ > That is, to somehow offer DTDs without named entity support. I forgot to mention: * One should, anyhow and since XHTML+RDFa is a recommended spec, try go get XHTML+RDFa mentioned on the W3 page which lists recommended DOCTYPEs. (After all, HTML5 is already there ...) http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 12:30:05 UTC