- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:49:22 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I am reviewing the current source version of the API, and I noticed there is no explicit handling of XML Literals. I know that these are just a special case of a typed literal, but since we deal with the specially in RDFa, it seems to me we should either define a class for them OR indicate that they are grouped with Typed Literals. What do people think? -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 26 April 2010 15:49:57 UTC