- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:36:26 +0100
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I think the RDFa 1.0 spec is silent on these; it would be nice if RDFa 1.1 could give some unambiguous answers. Firstly, given: <p property="ex:foo"><!--hello--><b>world</b></p> Should the literal be: '<!--hello--><b xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">world</b>' Or should it be: '<b xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">world</b>' That is, do we include comments in the canonicalisation XMLLiteral? In RDF/XML they are included, but that's a serialisation-specific decision; we could decide to specify it the other way. Secondly, given: <p property="ex:foo"><!--hello-->world</p> Is the presence of the comment enough to trigger the generation of an XMLLiteral, or should a plain literal be generated instead? For what it's worth, the current behaviour of my parser is to include comments in XMLLiterals, but for the presence of a comment to not trigger generating an XMLLiteral. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 16:37:07 UTC