Re: RDF WG ends

On 04 Jun 2014, at 17:11 , Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 5:42 PM, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> Looking at the errata [1] I see  only a few editorial comments being
>> submitted:
>> - Turtle has one error in an example, but I suggest to leave that as it
>> is, as it requires a AC vote to change.
>> - Primer has three proposed editorial fixes, all small. However,
>> republishing a Note we can decide ourselves, and it would be good to
>> leave as few as possible loose ends.
> 
> There's exists also very minor error in the JSON-LD spec:
>   http://www.w3.org/2014/json-ld-errata
> 
> This errors are very minor and in non-normative sections of the documents
> (examples), so it's really a shame that the W3C process doesn't allow to fix
> these in place?

Unfortunately, no... Whatever is in /TR is cast in concrete. And republishing a recommendation, even in edited form, requires indeed an AC round...

Ivan

> 
> 
>> PROPOSED: Republish a new version of the Primer as WG Note, with errata
>> fixes (see [2] for the ED with the fixes).
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
WebID: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me