Re: REC drafts ready for copy to TR space

The documents have been uploaded to the server; next step is for our webmaster
to check them...

Ivan

Ivan Herman wrote:
> Thanks Guus. I will take it from here.
>
> Ivan
>
> Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> Ivan,
>>
>> The 8 recommendations [1] can be copied to TR space. The Notes follow later.
>> All are pub-rules checked; only errors are crosslinks within the set of
>> documents to be published on 25 Feb. I included a listing of the changes since
>> PR.
>>
>> Guus
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Main_Page#REC_drafts
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> * Fix in Turtle & TriG: thread
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2014Feb/0018.html
>> clearly shows this fix is met with wide approval from the implementers
>>
>> * Concpets: no "changes" section; SOTD says none
>> * Semantics:
>>     Typo fixed in Sec. 7.
>> * Turtle:
>>     Missing prefix added in example 11 in response to comment from Lars Svensson.
>>     Error in grammar productions [21] and [23] fixed.
>>     Error in grammar productions [24] and [25] fixed.
>> * TriG
>>    Error in grammar productions [24] and [25] fixed.
>> * N-Triples
>>    Bug in grammar rule [6] concerning language-typed literals fixed.
>> * N-Quads
>>    Bug in grammar rule [7] concerning language-typed literals fixed.
>> * RDF/XML: none
>> * RDF Schema: none
>>
>