public-rdf-wg@w3.org from October 2013 by date

Thursday, 31 October 2013

• candidate CR version of Semantics Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: implementation reports Gregg Kellogg
• implementation reports Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: message to RDF entailment implementors Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: message to RDF entailment implementors Pat Hayes
• N-Triples/N-Quads/TriG/Semantics earl reports Gregg Kellogg
• editing fix to Semantics Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

• Re: potential RDF entailment systems Dan Brickley
• Re: potential RDF entailment systems Peter Patel-Schneider
• RDF/JSON Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: potential RDF entailment systems Kingsley Idehen
• message to RDF entailment implementors Peter Patel-Schneider
• potential RDF entailment systems Peter Patel-Schneider
• RDF 1.1 CR transition Guus Schreiber
• Static version of Concept's CR spec ready Markus Lanthaler
• RE: removing normative reference to HTML5 Markus Lanthaler
• RDF-ISSUE-169: DOM4 dependency [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• removing normative reference to HTML5 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• PROPOSED resolution of Turtle LC comment 36 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• PROPOSED resolution of Turtle LC comment 38 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RDF-ISSUE-168: [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

• agenda 30 Oct telecon [NOTE: for Europeans1 hour earlier] Guus Schreiber

Sunday, 27 October 2013

• No telecon this week Manu Sporny

Friday, 25 October 2013

• Re: A comment on issue-148 Antoine Zimmermann

Thursday, 24 October 2013

• A comment on issue-148 Pat Hayes
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) Pat Hayes
• Re: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Pat Hayes
• RE: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Pat Hayes
• New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Pat Hayes
• RE: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Pierre-Antoine Champin
• New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) Pat Hayes
• Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

• Re: what do we need for the CR meeting? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what do we need for the CR meeting? Guus Schreiber
• what do we need for the CR meeting? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 Gavin Carothers
• Fwd: Transition Request: JSON-LD to Proposed Recommendation Guus Schreiber
• Fwd: Transition Request: RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to Candidate Recommendation Guus Schreiber
• RE: Unable to make changes using Mercurial Markus Lanthaler
• Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 Markus Lanthaler
• RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• JSON-LD PR Transition Request ready / ACTION-314 Markus Lanthaler
• Unable to make changes using Mercurial Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• edits made for Turtle CR Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: comments re issue-166 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Guus Schreiber
• Re: comments re issue-166 Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: comments re issue-166 Guus Schreiber
• Re: comments re issue-166 Sandro Hawke
• comments re issue-166 Pat Hayes
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

• Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Markus Lanthaler
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-22 Manu Sporny
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Andy Seaborne
• RE: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Markus Lanthaler
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation Guus Schreiber
• RDF-ISSUE-166: LC Comment: Michael Schneider - non-urgent issues [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-165 (datatype map): LC Comment: datatype map [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-164 (@reverse bug): Pierre-Antoine Champin: @reverse algorithm is counter-intuitive [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-162 (OData/JSON-LD Convergence): Attempt to converge markup mechanisms for OData and JSON-LD [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann

Monday, 21 October 2013

• Fwd: Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) Guus Schreiber
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 Markus Lanthaler
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 20 October 2013

• almost-CR version of Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Made JSON-LD API non-normative Markus Lanthaler
• RDF-ISSUE-161: CR/CR Comment: Michael Schneider [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax Pat Hayes

Saturday, 19 October 2013

• Micheal Schneider's Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax Sandro Hawke

Friday, 18 October 2013

• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Gavin Carothers
• fixed up test case rdfs-entailment-2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Sandro Hawke
• RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 17 October 2013

• Steps to Move Concepts to CR David Wood
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

• JSON-LD PR request Guus Schreiber
• RDF 1.1 CR request Guus Schreiber
• Fwd: Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-160: N-Triples LC WD typos [RDF N-Triples] Guus Schreiber
• RDF-ISSUE-160: N-Triples LC WD typos [RDF N-Triples] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) Guus Schreiber
• Re: Previous Editors in ReSpec Docs? (RDF WG ISSUE-150) Marcos Caceres
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" David Wood
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" Ted Thibodeau Jr
• RE: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" Markus Lanthaler
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon Gregg Kellogg
• Previous Editors in ReSpec Docs? (RDF WG ISSUE-150) David Wood
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Ivan Herman
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time (DST) change reminder; 27-Oct to 3-Nov Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

• RE: agenda 16 Oct telecon Markus Lanthaler
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-15 Manu Sporny
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon Guus Schreiber
• RE: agenda 16 Oct telecon Markus Lanthaler
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Ivan Herman
• Upcoming Publishing Moratoria David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: reified statements in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux
• agenda 16 Oct telecon Guus Schreiber
• Response to ISSUE-159 Pat Hayes

Monday, 14 October 2013

• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) Guus Schreiber
• Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts Sandro Hawke
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 15th 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 15th 2013 Manu Sporny

Sunday, 13 October 2013

• Re: changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159) Pat Hayes

Saturday, 12 October 2013

• changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed response to ISSUE-159 Pat Hayes

Friday, 11 October 2013

• Re: treatment of -comments messages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: treatment of -comments messages Guus Schreiber
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Guus Schreiber
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] Pat Hayes

Thursday, 10 October 2013

• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] Sandro Hawke
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• treatment of -comments messages Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

• Re: running test suites Gregg Kellogg
• running test suites Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Sandro Hawke
• Minutes for 09 Oct 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• ack Brian McBride as previous series editor in Semantics ISSUE-150 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle Andy Seaborne
• ISSUE-158: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to action-147 RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-157: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to issue-147 RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-155: Media type parameter for turtle RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-154: Media type parameter for turtle RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon Markus Lanthaler
• RDF-ISSUE-153: Ryan Laboucane: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Pat Hayes
• Re: json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts Manu Sporny
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts Sandro Hawke
• JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts Manu Sporny
• json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

• Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon David Wood
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-08 Manu Sporny
• Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon Gregg Kellogg
• Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• agenda 9 Oct telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDF-ISSUE-152: CR comment: reified statements in Turtle [RDF Turtle] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Guus Schreiber
• RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Pat Hayes
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 8th 2013 Manu Sporny

Monday, 7 October 2013

• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 6 October 2013

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Guus Schreiber
• Re: advice on appropriate responses to comments Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts] Guus Schreiber
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 Guus Schreiber

Saturday, 5 October 2013

• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Pat Hayes

Friday, 4 October 2013

• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Pat Hayes
• Re: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations Pat Hayes
• ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: advice on appropriate responses to comments Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: advice on appropriate responses to comments Sandro Hawke
• RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations Ivan Herman
• advice on appropriate responses to comments Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful Pat Hayes
• Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations Pat Hayes

Thursday, 3 October 2013

• Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Peter Patel-Schneider
• RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed Dataset negative entailment test Gregg Kellogg
• Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations Peter Patel-Schneider
• RE: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts] Peter Patel-Schneider
• RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents Gavin Carothers
• Fwd: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents Guus Schreiber
• Fwd: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents Guus Schreiber
• Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents Guus Schreiber
• RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• response to Jeremy on ISSUE-144 Ivan Herman
• readme and license for entailment tests Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposed Dataset negative entailment test Pat Hayes
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

• Re: a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests Gregg Kellogg
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup Peter Patel-Schneider
• a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests Peter Patel-Schneider
• JSON-LD CR Implementers: Update to test suite Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: browser warnings on WG documents Sandro Hawke
• Re: Proposed Dataset negative entailment test Sandro Hawke
• Minutes for 2013-10-02 Gavin Carothers
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter Andy Seaborne
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] whitespace before '.' and ';' Andy Seaborne
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth Dan Brickley
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth Antoine Zimmermann
• Proposed Dataset negative entailment test Gregg Kellogg
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] whitespace before '.' and ';' Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] Patrick J. Hayes
• Re: ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth Patrick J. Hayes
• Re: browser warnings on WG documents Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics Patrick J. Hayes
• [Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [Turtle CR Issue] whitespace before '.' and ';' Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda 2 Oct telecon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RDF-ISSUE-149: LC comment: Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-147: Definition of "Generalized RDF" [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-146: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-145: Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: browser warnings on WG documents Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] Antoine Zimmermann
• browser warnings on WG documents Peter Patel-Schneider
• generalized RDF comment from David Booth Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] Peter Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics Peter Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-01 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup Peter Patel-Schneider
• RDF-ISSUE-144: Minor normative error in LC drafts [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-01 Manu Sporny
• agenda 2 Oct telecon Guus Schreiber

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 21:51:29 UTC