Re: adding inline graphs to TriG

On 7/23/13 1:49 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:28 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> * Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> [2013-07-23 13:52+0100]
>>> I think that IF we do this, we do it properly - {} in the subject
>>> position is important and the the new syntax is already some way
>>> away from traditional TriG + it is no longer trying to be
>>> SPARQL-compatible.
>>>
>>> Hence: proposal:
>>>
>>> 1/ Give it a new name and content type.
>>>
>>> This would be better and probably smooth the process of getting a
>>> REC because a new name does not bring old assumptions with it.  No
>>> issues with existing use.
>>>
>>> 2/ Do not have {} for the default graph.
>>>
>>> Do have {}-graphs in the subject as well as object positions.
>>>
>>> 3/ Publish TriG as a NOTE.  It is useful to give it some kind of
>>> status with the changes for Turtle token alignment etc.
>> I think we should seriously consider this proposal. It may be the best
>> path for us to engage potential RDF users with an attractive and
>> practical language.
> +1
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
+1

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen