W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2013

RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:14:14 +0200
To: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00dd01ce7d88$86221d50$926657f0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:46 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Yeah, the situation with respect to numbers is now probably as good as
> it can be, modulo reception from the JSON community.
>  
> The JSON-LD API needs to distinguish "fractional part" from RFD 4627
> JSON numbers "fraction part" and frac production.  The suggestion on the
> call today, something like "fractional part (i.e., the remainder modulo 1)",
> I believe, would work fine, I think.

I've already updated the spec, diff(s):
  https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/70db9f9e3593b6cc5957be7534bca655577de53c
  https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/157954cf8b12618effc675f3a89dbf3681089361


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler



 
> peter
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/10/2013 08:04 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:51 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >> On 07/10/2013 06:49 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >>> This was already proposed by Pierre-Antoine some time ago but
> didn't
> >> have enough support to result in a spec change. I could live with
> that
> >> but wouldn't be too happy about it because it would mean that a
> JSON-LD
> >> document like
> >>>     {
> >>>       "@id
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 16:14:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:30 UTC