RE: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG

On Jul 7, 2013 6:25 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, July 07, 2013 12:50 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > We can be conservative or liberal about what can go the the graph name
> > position:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I prefer the latter as it encourages the good practice of making
> > assertions about labeled graphs, e.g.
> > [[
> >   [ :utteredBy "Bob" ] { <moon> <madeOf> <greenCheese> }
> > ]]
>
> Me too but under the current semantics those wouldn't be assertions about
> the labeled graph as the graph name doesn't denote the graph. I still find
> that very problematic.

Sandro responded to this in another thread. For bookkeeping purposes, I'd
like to point out that this is not an issue with the proposed grammar but
instead the semantic doc.

> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>