- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 13:17:33 +0200
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, July 05, 2013 6:50 PM Gregg Kellogg, wrote:
> It also makes sense that @list can be the value of rdf:rest (and
> perhaps rdf:first, as well). The algorithm would find the list head at
I haven't thought much about it yet but wouldn't allowing it in rdf:first
mean that (without additional checks) you would end up creating list of
lists? We currently keep a reference to the bnode-object that is then
replaced with a @list-object. Doing that for rdf:first would mean that you
could replace a bnode-reference in a list with a list.
> the first node having rdf:first/rest with only single well-formed
> values, as it does now; this should include those for which the subject
> is a non-well-formed value of an rdf:rest.
>
> An example @afs and I were working on offline is more like the
> following:
>
> Turtle:
>
> @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
> @prefix : <http://example/> .
>
> :x :list _:a .
>
> _:a rdf:first 1 .
> _:a :additional "foo" .
> _:a rdf:rest _:b .
>
> _:b rdf:first 2 .
> _:b rdf:rest _:c .
>
> _:c rdf:first 3 .
> _:c rdf:rest rdf:nil .
>
> JSON-LD:
>
> {
> "@context": {...},
> "@id": "_:x",
> "list": {
> "additional": "foo",
> "rdf:first": 1,
> "rdf:rest: {"@list": [2, 3]}
> }
> }
Yes, that's a consequence of allowing @list as value of rdf:rest and is what
I meant when I referred to OpenAnnotation.
--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Saturday, 6 July 2013 11:18:08 UTC