W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:38:13 -0600
Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9A103984-FAF6-4BC5-81EF-2FF2C4C2D198@greggkellogg.net>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Jul 3, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 7:23 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> A graph in JSON-LD should be a generalized RDF graph.
> 
> But it is not. JSON-LD has built-in lists (because JSON has arrays) - mapping them to rdf:List is trivial but nevertheless they are part of the data model in JSON-LD. The situation is similar for numbers and booleans.

I don't consider JSON-LD lists as being conceptually any different that Turtle Lists; these are artifacts of the serialization, and not the underlying data model.

Gregg

> We can't ignore the JSON in JSON-LD.
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 21:38:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:30 UTC