- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:38:13 -0600
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 3, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 7:23 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> A graph in JSON-LD should be a generalized RDF graph. > > But it is not. JSON-LD has built-in lists (because JSON has arrays) - mapping them to rdf:List is trivial but nevertheless they are part of the data model in JSON-LD. The situation is similar for numbers and booleans. I don't consider JSON-LD lists as being conceptually any different that Turtle Lists; these are artifacts of the serialization, and not the underlying data model. Gregg > We can't ignore the JSON in JSON-LD. > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 21:38:42 UTC