- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:33:51 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: 'RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I believe that somehow you are missing the idea of the "should" in my statement. My changes to Appendix A were to turn this "should" into reality. peter On 07/03/2013 10:33 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 7:23 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> A graph in JSON-LD should be a generalized RDF graph. > But it is not. JSON-LD has built-in lists (because JSON has arrays) - mapping them to rdf:List is trivial but nevertheless they are part of the data model in JSON-LD. The situation is similar for numbers and booleans. > > We can't ignore the JSON in JSON-LD. > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:34:20 UTC