W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:33:51 -0700
Message-ID: <51D46E8F.20608@gmail.com>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: 'RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I believe that somehow you are missing the idea of the "should" in my statement.

My changes to Appendix A were to turn this "should" into reality.

peter

On 07/03/2013 10:33 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 03, 2013 7:23 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> A graph in JSON-LD should be a generalized RDF graph.
> But it is not. JSON-LD has built-in lists (because JSON has arrays) - mapping them to rdf:List is trivial but nevertheless they are part of the data model in JSON-LD. The situation is similar for numbers and booleans.
>
> We can't ignore the JSON in JSON-LD.
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 18:34:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:30 UTC