- From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 08:04:24 -0700
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 15:04:56 UTC
On 07/03/2013 07:51 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: On 07/03/2013 10:46 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: Before Semantics can go to Last Call, ISSUE-118 must be resolved. My understanding is that the group has consensus on this, but it has not yet been formally recorded. Yes? I believe that there is consensus, and that this consensus corresponds to the wording in Semantics (and Concepts). I also believe that the issue has been debated in recent WG telecons so there should be no bar to quickly resolving it. Can we resolve to close it, accepting the design in the current editor's draft? Before Semantics and Concepts can go to Last Call, ISSUE-113 should be resolved. Similarly, on this. I thought we'd actually decided on this win, to do nothing, but maybe I'm misremembering. We may have resolved to do nothing on this issue (a request to add at least keys to RDF), and I think that the request is out of scope. I just noticed that the issue was open, took a look at it, and realized that it impacted Semantics so I flagged it. peter
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 15:04:56 UTC