W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Comments on RDF Concepts

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:32:15 -0500
Cc: "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2910D40C-327C-4208-B6A5-8A52E49B547A@ihmc.us>
To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Quick comment on one point:

On Jul 1, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I had a look at the latest version of RDF Concepts and have a couple of
> comments and suggestions:
> 
> 

...
> Can we (re)move sections 1.7 Equivalence, Entailment and Inconsistency and
> 3.6 Graph Isomorphism, and 4.1 RDF Dataset Isomorphism (to Semantics)?
> 

I would like to keep graph *isomorphism* and dataset *isomorphism* in Concepts. They are not semantic ideas, but part of the abstract syntax specification; and it is good to keep them clearly distinct from the semantic idea of (logical) equivalence. 

Pat

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 1 July 2013 23:32:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:30 UTC