public-rdf-wg@w3.org from July 2013 by date

Thursday, 25 July 2013

• RE: syntax evolution, was Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Markus Lanthaler

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

• syntax evolution, was Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Sandro Hawke
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Kingsley Idehen
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Schreiber, A.T.
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Andy Seaborne
• RE: adding inline graphs to TriG Markus Lanthaler
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Sandro Hawke
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

• Intent to close ISSUE-222 Markus Lanthaler
• Intent to close ISSUE-276 Markus Lanthaler
• Intent to close ISSUE-261 Markus Lanthaler
• Intent to close ISSUE-264 Markus Lanthaler
• Intent to close ISSUE-277 Markus Lanthaler
• Intent to close ISSUE-279 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: agenda 24 Jul telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: LC of Conceots and Semantics published David Wood
• RE: adding inline graphs to TriG Markus Lanthaler
• LC of Conceots and Semantics published Guus Schreiber
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-23 Manu Sporny
• Re: reificiation - was Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Pat Hayes
• agenda 24 Jul telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Andy Seaborne

Monday, 22 July 2013

• Re: reificiation - was Re: adding inline graphs to TriG David Wood
• Re: reificiation - was Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• reificiation - was Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Sandro Hawke
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 23rd 2013 Manu Sporny

Sunday, 21 July 2013

• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Ivan Mikhailov
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Manu Sporny

Thursday, 18 July 2013

• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Gregg Kellogg
• RE: adding inline graphs to TriG Markus Lanthaler
• RE: "generalized", please; was Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-16 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: adding inline graphs to TriG Pat Hayes
• adding inline graphs to TriG Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

• "generalized", please; was Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-16 Sandro Hawke
• Call for Exclusions (Update): RDF 1.1 Semantics; TriG Ian Jacobs
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-16 Manu Sporny
• Re: Concepts ready for LC David Wood
• Re: Concepts ready for LC Guus Schreiber
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Respec2html help Sandro Hawke

Monday, 15 July 2013

• Respec2html help Gavin Carothers
• Re: Regrets for Wed's Telecon David Wood
• Re: Regrets for Wed's Telecon Arnaud Le Hors
• Concepts ready for LC David Wood
• Regrets for Wed's Telecon David Wood
• Re: potential edit for Concepts section 1.7 David Wood
• Re: proposal: N-Quads as subset of TriG Souripriya Das
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 16th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: proposal: N-Quads as subset of TriG Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 14 July 2013

• Re: proposal: N-Quads as subset of TriG Souripriya Das
• proposal: N-Quads as subset of TriG Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 13 July 2013

• RDF WG teleconference record 10 July 2013 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 12 July 2013

• Re: public-comments David Wood
• public-comments Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 11 July 2013

• Re: URLs in Data Working Draft David Wood

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• RE: more (ugh) on JSON-LD numbers Markus Lanthaler
• Re: potential edit for Concepts section 1.7 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model (RDF-ISSUE-132) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: potential edit for Concepts section 1.7 Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model (RDF-ISSUE-132) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: more (ugh) on JSON-LD numbers Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-138: Guidance to RDF users and developers about which syntaxes to parse and publish RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• potential edit for Concepts section 1.7 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: more (ugh) on JSON-LD numbers Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RE: What are JSON numbers; was Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• more (ugh) on JSON-LD numbers Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [All] Agenda for 10 July 2013 Yves Raimond
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: What are JSON numbers; was Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Sandro Hawke
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• "at risk" language for TriG sparql-alignment features Sandro Hawke
• Re: What are JSON numbers; was Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• What are JSON numbers; was Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Sandro Hawke
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-09 Manu Sporny
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [All] Agenda for 10 July 2013 Andy Seaborne
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: [All] Agenda for 10 July 2013 Pat Hayes

Monday, 8 July 2013

• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Andy Seaborne
• RE: dataset semantics -- was Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [All] Agenda for 10 July 2013 David Wood
• Re: [All] Agenda for 10 July 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• [All] Agenda for 10 July 2013 David Wood
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 7 July 2013

• Re: Some syntax tests for issue-137 (GRAPH + Turtle-in-TriG) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: dataset semantics -- was Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Sandro Hawke
• Some syntax tests for issue-137 (GRAPH + Turtle-in-TriG) Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Gavin Carothers
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: dataset semantics -- was Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Markus Lanthaler
• dataset semantics -- was Re: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Sandro Hawke
• RE: ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Markus Lanthaler
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 9th 2013 Manu Sporny

Saturday, 6 July 2013

• ACTION-278: grammar for TriG Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Convert also "partial" lists from RDF to JSON-LD Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Convert also "partial" lists from RDF to JSON-LD Pat Hayes

Friday, 5 July 2013

• Re: PROPOSED to RESOLVE ISSUE-127 with Canonical N-Triples Gavin Carothers
• PROPOSED to RESOLVE ISSUE-127 with Canonical N-Triples Gavin Carothers
• Re: Convert also "partial" lists from RDF to JSON-LD Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Convert also "partial" lists from RDF to JSON-LD Markus Lanthaler
• Convert also "partial" lists from RDF to JSON-LD Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Antoine Zimmermann

Thursday, 4 July 2013

• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Pat Hayes
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RE: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Help with Pubrules Compliance for Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Help with Pubrules Compliance for Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Help with Pubrules Compliance for Concepts David Wood
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RE: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Andy Seaborne
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RDF Concepts: Add definition for literals that are not language-tagged strings Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Andy Seaborne
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Help with Pubrules Compliance for Concepts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Help with Pubrules Compliance for Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Help with Pubrules Compliance for Concepts David Wood

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Gregg Kellogg
• Semantics as ready as can be for LCWD Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: getting non-respec source Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• RE: getting non-respec source Markus Lanthaler
• getting non-respec source Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: how to get informative appendices Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: how to get informative appendices Gavin Carothers
• how to get informative appendices Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts David Wood
• FW: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Comments on RDF Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Comments on RDF Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts David Wood
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-137 (aligning-trig-and-sparql): Should TriG be a subset of SPARQL Quad Pattern? [RDF TriG] Andy Seaborne
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Gregg Kellogg
• Turtle includes Notation3 and SPARQL prefix and base directives Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon David Wood
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts David Wood
• N-Triples and N-Quads ready for review Gavin Carothers
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon David Wood
• RE: Comments on rdf11-json Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Comments on rdf11-json Andy Seaborne
• RE: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Comments on rdf11-json Markus Lanthaler
• RE: agenda 3 Jul telecon Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Pat Hayes
• RDF-ISSUE-137 (aligning-trig-and-sparql): Should TriG be a subset of SPARQL Quad Pattern? [RDF TriG] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon David Wood

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

• Comments on rdf11-json Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Gavin Carothers
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-07-02 Manu Sporny
• Re: agenda 3 Jul telecon David Wood
• agenda 3 Jul telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: Don't Make Me Think (About Linked Data) Kingsley Idehen
• Don't Make Me Think (About Linked Data) Manu Sporny
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Updated JSON-LD spec to more closely align w/ RDF data model Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts Andy Seaborne
• RE: Comments on RDF Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 2nd 2013 Markus Lanthaler

Monday, 1 July 2013

• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts Gavin Carothers
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts Pat Hayes
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 2nd 2013 Markus Lanthaler
• Comments on RDF Concepts Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 2nd 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• Review of RDF/JSON Andy Seaborne
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, July 2nd 2013 Manu Sporny

Last message date: Thursday, 25 July 2013 20:11:35 UTC