- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:37:38 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 17:38:10 UTC
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote: > I realize that this may open a can of worms, but we need a fairly > definitive answer from the RDF WG on JSON-LD and using bnode identifiers > for predicates and graph names. > I don't think the definitive answer has changed since before the working group started. In fact you'll find in the Charter blank nodes as predicates being explicitly out of scope. The issue of blank nodes as graph names has also been resolved. See all the publications of the RDF 1.1 Concepts documents, or just the most recent one http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130115/#section-dataset
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 17:38:10 UTC