- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:28:52 -0500
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 21:29:21 UTC
Hi Gregg, OK, so noted. Please be aware that the abbreviations used in the extension request are not the same as the W3 short names. They are merely a convenience used to make the tables readable. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood On Jan 23, 2013, at 16:25, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > Dave, in your draft extension request [1] you list rdf-jsonapi as Note track, when in fact, it's REC track, along with rdf-jsonsyn. BTW, these are your short-names, and not those actually assigned. We've been using json-ld-syntax and json-ld-api, but I believe there's a request to change the API document to JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API, with a short name of json-ld-processing. > > At this point, we think we'll complete editing work on the Syntax document in January, but won't finish the Processing document until the middle of February. > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Rdf-extension.html
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 21:29:21 UTC