- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:08:23 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
"Graph names are unique within an RDF dataset."
[RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Section 4.]
Le 23/01/2013 07:12, Pat Hayes a écrit :
> In case I don't get on the call, there is a quesiton I would like to raise concerning dataset equivalence. Suppose a dataset has two named graphs with the same label, such as (sorry if I get the syntax wrong here)
>
> { n1: {a b c.}
> n1: {d e f .} }
>
> and the other dataset has these two graphs unioned together with the same label:
>
> {ni: {a b c .
> d e f .}}
>
> Are these datasets equivalent? We need to decide the answers to questions like this.
>
> Pat
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:39 PM, David Wood wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The agenda for Wed, 23 Jan 2013 is available at:
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.01.23
>>
>> Chair: David Wood
>> Scribe: Richard Cyganiak
>> Alternate: Sandro Hawke
>>
>> This week, we will look at the remaining Semantics issue and some open issues related to clean up tasks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> --
>> http://about.me/david_wood
>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 07:10:35 UTC