- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:34:34 -0800
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPqY83wbS90jhpoSNvxx_oeTR6cKNBy9SnuxvB4SKj0ijjU1yQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:20 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have read through Eric's changes and feel that they are appropriate > (unless Gavin objects). Gavin? > Nope, no objections. > > Eric has also produced a test coverage report and will upload it to dvcs. > Thanks, Eric! > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > > > On Dec 30, 2012, at 23:06, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > > > I finally got a good chance to make a detailed review of the Last Call > grammar and test out the semantics. > > > > I tweaked the grammar slightly but the language it defines is the same: > > Struck NIL because it wasn't referenced > > Unfactored blank because it wasn't always blank (could be rdf:nil). > > Changed [Pp][Rr][Ee][Ff][Ii][Xx] to "PREFIX" with a note about case. > > Added missing xs before unicode code points in PN_CHARS_BASE and > PN_CHARS. > > > > In the semantics, I updated the term constructors to indicate which > escaping was relevent where and updated the Triple Constructors after > testing the algorithm against all of the Turtle tests that Andy submitted. > > > > Green stuff in <http://www.w3.org/2012/12/Turtle-ericP> is stuff I > propose to add. Red I propose to remove. I think it's worth getting this > right before CR. Most of my feedback comes from my own XMass CR period. I > believe all of this is clarifications or editorial adjustments so we could > still go to CR immediately. > > > > I also aligned the Turtle grammar intro more with the SPARQL spec 'cause > it's pretty well weathered and had a lot of useful points. (We'll probably > want to strike "6 In signed numbers, no white space is allowed between the > sign and the number." if folks agree that it's not helpful to the Turtle > spec, but stuff like identifying tokens and case sensitivity is a good > idea.) > > > > BTW, we don't need the At-risk that we discussed for the { <s> <p> <o> > ;;; . } decision as it was present in the LC grammar. > > -- > > -ericP > > > >
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 05:35:01 UTC