W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

change needed in RDF concepts

From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:03:29 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMpDgVwgU39=JcqvabdQ8oobbfKbAw2ESWXXYRJVU0anS81CPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
RDF Concepts says:

This transformation [Skolemization] does not change the meaning of an RDF
graph, provided that the Skolem IRIs do not occur anywhere else.

This isn't true.  (Well, it's sort of true if you aren't looking at the
semantics, but even so it should be qualified.)

I suggest adding an "appreciably" to the statement.

Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 20:03:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:25 UTC