- From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:03:29 -0800
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 20:03:57 UTC
RDF Concepts says: This transformation [Skolemization] does not change the meaning of an RDF graph, provided that the Skolem IRIs do not occur anywhere else. This isn't true. (Well, it's sort of true if you aren't looking at the semantics, but even so it should be qualified.) I suggest adding an "appreciably" to the statement. peter
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 20:03:57 UTC