- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:17:48 +0000
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> Would it be reasonable to create a class, such as rdfs:NamedGraph, >> which could be asserted or inferred on an IRI to indicate that it >> denotes the graph which it names? This could have some inference >> rules, such that if the IRI is used in a subject or object of a >> graph, and is used to name a graph in the same dataset, that the >> IRI then denotes the graph it names? Consider something such as the >> following: >> >> {?iri :p :o } >> ?iri { :s1 :p1 :o1 } >> >> => { ?iri a rfs:NamedGraph } >> >> Same for predicate and object relations, and probably if the IRI is >> used within a Named Graph as well as the default graph. >> >> Providing such a type, if not the inference rules, would seem the >> minimum we should do to allow an author to indicate that a graph >> name actually denotes the graph it names. You could state that the document uses a certain style: { <> :graphLabeling :denotation } or { <> :graphLabeling :snapshot } Andy
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 08:18:19 UTC