W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2013

RE: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:12:04 +0100
To: "'Steve Harris'" <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <014f01ce137b$3cc26100$b6472300$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Monday, February 25, 2013 4:46 PM, Steve Harris wrote:

> I believe it would be more correct to say that graph labels do not HAVE
> to demote the graph, they're allowed to if you want them to.
> Regardless, the example is valid regardless on whatever graph labelling
> semantics are being used - within some system with a known relationship
> between graph labels and metadata.
> If the graph label refers to the document which was parsed, and the
> metadata refers to the parsing (which is a very common situation), then
> the example is equally valid.
> I think you may be attaching too much important to the idea of
> denoting.

Yes, maybe I am. The future will show.

Markus Lanthaler
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 17:12:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:25 UTC