Re: (very) first draft of semantics available

I'm looking over the draft.

It appears to me that the relationship between datatypes and rdf:type (and
class extensions) has been lost, which is rather problematic, to say the
least.

peter


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:

> A very early and incomplete draft of the revised semantics document is now
> in the repository at
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html
>
> It does not have the inference rule section or the appendices or the
> references done, its css is slightly broken, it is rife with issues, and
> the html markup (links, references, etc.) is woefully incomplete, but at
> least it exists.
>
> Comments are welcome on the actual text.
>
> Peter, your bio info in the header needs updating.
>
> Richard, check out the datatype section, which is now much simpler. It
> assumes that D is simply a set of recognized datatype IRIs, rather than a
> functional datatype 'map'. Do you approve? If so, you can simplify that
> section of Concepts. But I do need bnode scopes, please. Pretty please.
>
> Pat
>
> PS. Many thanks to Richard and Gavin for teaching me how to work Mercurial.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:08:19 UTC