- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:39:39 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
* Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> [2013-02-14 07:02-0500] > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 20:28 , Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name> wrote: > > > Not sure when, but I'd proposed splitting to Note, Ivan and Sandro objected. > > > > > > And I honestly do not remember this:-( My reservation is probably based on the sheer number of documents we produce and make it sure that stuff is done. By keeping it as an appendix the whole issue becomes closed; by pushing it into a Note we will have to go through a bunch of admin and practical hooplas... iirc, the WG consensus was that we didn't want to lose an opportunity to suggest that the world could use simple data assertions in script elements instead of burrying the data in markup à la RDFa. > Ivan > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote: > > Eric, Gavin, > > > > I took an action [1] today to find whether we have a record of revising our decision about Turtle+HTML, i.e. to keep this section in a non-normative part of the main document. > > This action is connected to ISSUE 116 [2]. > > > > The resolution is in the minutes of the 10 Oct 2012 telecon: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-10#resolution_17 > > > > I believe this completes my action. > > > > Guus > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/229 > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/116 > > > > > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > -- -ericP
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 22:40:08 UTC