- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:11:20 -0500
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 12:11:51 UTC
On 12/18/13 9:33 PM, David Booth wrote, in response to Guus: > > I gather that someone didn't like the word "should" or the > phrase "is intended to" that were proposed earlier. As a > compromise, how about inserting "RDF assumes that": > > "By design, IRIs have global scope. Thus, RDF assumes > that two different appearances of an IRI denote the same > resource. Violating this principle constitutes an IRI > collision [WEBARCH]." > http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-collision +1 -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 12:11:51 UTC