W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Revied proposal: rdf:HTML/XMLLiteral non-normative

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:25:08 +0100
Message-ID: <52B204A4.4030207@vu.nl>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'Richard Cyganiak' <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: 'RDF Working Group WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>


On 18-12-13 21:05, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:01 PM, Guus Schreiber
>> Markus, Richard,  all,
>>
>> Nice, let's do it this way. I quote the proposal below to make everybody
>> aware. This proposal  replaces the one voted on during the telecon. I
>> assume this falls under the leeway that the resolution of today gave
>> the editors and the chairs.
>
> Great! I've just updated Concepts according the proposal below with one
> minor tweak (see below). I also implemented all changes we discussed today
> (ref. to Semantics non-normative etc.).
>
>
>> 1. rdf:HTML and rdf:XMLLiteral are marked as non-normative
>>
>> 2. Wording changes:
>>
>> In the sections rdf:HTML and rdf:XMLLiteral, add:
>>
>> [[
>> This datatype is defined as non-normative because it depends on [DOM4],
>> a specification that has not yet reached W3C Recommendation status.
>> ]]
>>
>> In Section 5.4, REPLACE this:
>>
>> [[
>> Recognized IRIs have fixed referents, which must satisfy these
>> conditions:
>>
>> If the IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral is
>> recognized then it refers to the datatype rdf:XMLLiteral
>> If the IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML is
>> recognized
>> then it refers to the datatype rdf:HTML
>> [.]
>> ]]
>>
>> with this:
>>
>> [[
>> Recognized IRIs have fixed referents, which must satisfy these
>> conditions:
>
> Since there's only one condition left, I reworded this to
>
>      Datatypes are identified by IRIs. If D is a set of IRIs which are
>      used to refer to datatypes, then the elements of D are called
>      recognized datatype IRIs. Recognized IRIs have fixed referents.
>      [changes start here]
>      If any IRI of the form http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#xxx is
>      recognized, it must refer to the RDF-compatible XSD type named
>      xsd:xxx for every XSD type listed in section 5.1. Furthermore,
>      the following IRIs are allocated for non-normative datatypes:
>
>      - The IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral
>        refers to the datatype rdf:XMLLiteral
>      - The IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML refers
>        to the datatype rdf:HTML
>
>
>> [.]
>>
>> Furthermore, the following IRIs are allocated for non-normative
>> datatypes:
>>
>> The IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral refers to
>> the datatype rdf:XMLLiteral
>> The IRI http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML refers to the
>> datatype rdf:HTML
>> ]]
>
>
> Richard, Guus, could you please have a quick look at the document. If you
> give me your OK, I'll go ahead and create the static PR draft.

OK, but leave the final static draft to me. The local biblio will need 
to be updated so that at publication time all docs cross-reference the 
PR versions. An advantage of Respec: this used to be a nightmare :).

Guus



>
>
> Oh.. and thanks Richard again for this revised proposal!
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 20:25:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC