W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: draft agenda 18 Dec telecon

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 19:03:51 +0100
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2A6CEA71-AC5C-4013-AA4E-ED1634142A25@w3.org>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

On 17 Dec 2013, at 17:46 , Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:33 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> On 17/12/13 16:29, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>>> Guus,
>>> 
>>> As previously announced we just had a JSON-LD CG telecon in which we
>>> 
>>> RESOLVED: Propose that the RDF WG petition the Director to take JSON- LD
> to
>>> Recommendation immediately after the publication of the Proposed
>>> Recommendations for the RDF 1.1 work.
>>> 
>>> Could you please add that to the agenda for tomorrow so that we can vote
> on
>>> it in the RDF WG.
>> 
>> How much time does this save?
> 
> My estimate is that it saves at least two months.

I do not think so. The PR voting period is minimum 4 weeks. If we publish the RDF 1.1 documents as PR, five weeks later everything can be published. (I count on a few days on the tail end to complete everything.). If instead, we publish JSON-LD right after having published JSON-LD, that means we save, say, four weeks, maximally five. 

Ivan

> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf






Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 18:04:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:37 UTC