- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:28:47 +0000
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 16 Dec 2013, at 16:32, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > Another question.. currently Concepts normatively references Semantics which > means we have a circular dependency. Is this what we want or shall we > convert the reference to be informative? > > Even though it could be argued either way, I think I would prefer to make it > informative. Thoughts (or has this already been discussed)? +1 to an informative reference. RDF Concepts defines the structure, RDF Semantics defines how to interpret the structure. This seems like the correct layering to me. I note that RDF Semantics is only referenced in informative material, so it’s not clear what a normative reference would mean. A normative reference doesn't seem to be necessary to define any of the things that RDF Concepts normatively defines. Best, Richard
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 18:29:12 UTC