- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:04:58 -0500
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 12/15/2013 11:38 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> [2013-12-14 19:23-0500] >> On Dec 14, 2013 11:44 PM, "Gavin Carothers" <gavin@carothers.name> wrote: >>> The changes to resolve the feature at risk were the last ones I was aware >> of. Hopefully everyone finds them acceptable. Will create the PR >> Overview.html(s) for everything this weekend. >> >> It looks good to me but I recall there being some text associated with the >> resolution to the effect of "use @prefix until the RDF 1.1 Turtle parsers >> are deployed." I'll dig that up in the morning unless someone else in the > Done. please see: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-iri > and the changeset at: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/rev/551b4b75eff0 > > [[ > Note > > The Turtle language originally permitted only the syntax including the > '@' character for writing prefix and base directives. The > case-insensitive 'PREFIX' and 'BASE' forms were added to align > Turtle's syntax with that of SPARQL. It is advisable to serialize RDF > using the '@prefix' and '@base' forms until RDF 1.1 Turtle parsers are > widely deployed. > ]] Can we also point people to https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html or maybe a www.w3.org proxy/snapshot of it, so people have a better chance of knowing when that is? Or is that misleading, because even if the software is updated, the people using the software will still be using old copies? Hrm. I guess no advice is better than bad advice. :-( -- Sandro > ... > [[ > This can be written using either the original Turtle syntax for prefix > declarations: > > Example 7 > ┌ > │@prefix somePrefix: <http://www.perceive.net/schemas/relationship/> . > │ > │<http://example.org/#green-goblin> somePrefix:enemyOf <http://example.org/#spiderman> . > └ > or SPARQL's syntax for prefix declarations: > > Example 8 > ┌ > │PREFIX somePrefix: <http://www.perceive.net/schemas/relationship/> > │ > │<http://example.org/#green-goblin> somePrefix:enemyOf <http://example.org/#spiderman> . > └ > ]] > > >> WG finds it first. The W3C HTML diff tool worked with the draft as of >> Wednesday so ideally that will go smoothly. I don't recall there being any >> agreed upon text for the SOTD but I can draft some in about 10 hours. >> >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: >>>> On Dec 12, 2013 5:03 PM, "Gavin Carothers" <gavin@carothers.name> wrote: >>>>> I've updated Turtle to include PREFIX/BASE as not At Risk features. >>>>> >>>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/rev/7153257b5d27 is the complete change >> set. Please provide any feedback you may have ASAP. >>>> You spoke of a list of pending Turtle issues on Wed. Are there remaining >> issues that you know of? >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Gavin >>>
Received on Sunday, 15 December 2013 17:05:07 UTC