- From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:09:26 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, wrong subject line. This concerns the four RDF 1.1 syntax docs On 12-12-13 16:07, Guus Schreiber wrote: > FYI > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Transition Request: four RDF 1.1 documents to Proposed > Recommendation > Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:01:25 +0000 > Resent-From: <team-rdf-chairs@w3.org> > Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:00:52 +0100 > From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> > To: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Philippe > Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org> > CC: W3C Communications Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, <chairs@w3.org>, > "team-rdf-chairs@w3.org WG" <team-rdf-chairs@w3.org> > > Dear Director, > > This is a transition request of the RDF Working Group to move four RDF > 1.1 documents to Proposed Recommendation: > > * RDF 1.1 Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language > * RDF 1.1 TriG - RDF Dataset Language > * RDF 1.1 N-Triples- A line-based syntax for an RDF graph > * RDF 1.1 N-Quads - A line-based syntax for an RDF datasets > > Details of the request are here: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/RDF11-PR-Request > > Note: This request also contains info about four other RDF 1.1 documents > that we expect to request P(E)R for at a near point in the future. > > Thanks in advance for considering this. > > Regards, > Guus Schreiber > RDF Working Group co-chair > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 15:09:58 UTC