W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Final Turtle rollup EARL report

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:17:15 -0700
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <38DA838D-1B7B-4BE0-A329-2F0CD3828848@greggkellogg.net>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
On Aug 29, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 8/29/13 10:50 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Aug 29, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/28/13 8:12 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>>> I've integrated the last EARL report for Turtle [1]. Note, that as it uses ReSpec, it can be saved out and frozen too.
>>>> 
>>>> The report shows 10 fully conforming implementations.
>>>> 
>>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Gregg,
>>> 
>>> Shouldn't the Turtle documents associated with each test suite submission be discoverable from these documents? Basically, their URLs should be referenced from this document etc..
>> 
>> Each input file used to generate the report is listed in appendix B [1]. How would you suggest marking this up to make it more machine readable?
>> 
>> Gregg
>> 
>> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html#individual-test-results
>> 
> 
> Currently, a user agent would end up with something that looks like the typical URIBurner page that describes a Web Document [1]. If you add <link/> based relations (e.g., rel="related" since "related" is IANA registered and maps to xhv:related) in the <head/> section of the HTML document, we end up with better description pages due to the fact that the "xhv:related" relations will be much more visible and comprehensible to both humans and machines :-)

There are two different kinds of referenced files, alternative versions of the EARL rollup (earl.jsonld and earl.ttl) and the source files used to generate the report. For the former, I think that xhv:alternate is most appropriate. For the latter, I agree with xhv:related. I've updated the repot (adding Jose Labra's recent submission) adding appropriate relations to both the <a> references, and <link> headers; this is redundant for RDFa, but might be useful for FeedBurner.

Also, note that "related" is not a term defined in an XHTML:RDFa initial context (although "alternate" is), in any case, the report is HTML5, which doesn't define any link relations; best is to add both "alternate" and 'xhv:alternate" along with "related" and 'xhv:related", the un-prefixed versions in the head section using <link>, the prefixed versions in the body.

Re-looking at your uriburner, I do see the xhv:alternate showing up, but not the xhv:related. Let me know if there are other changes you thing would be useful.

Gregg

> [1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/https/dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html#individual-test-results .
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	      
> Founder & CEO 
> OpenLink Software     
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 


Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 18:17:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:31 UTC