- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:46:21 -0700
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: "'RDF Working Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Aug 8, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:47 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> We need to do *something*, as the above definition is now wrong. For
>> example, it says that these are isomorphic:
>>
>> { {_:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .}
>> _:x {ex:a ex:b ex:c} }
>>
>> { {_:y rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .}
>> _:x {ex:a ex:b ex:c} }
>>
>> which is incorrect.
>
> Pat, according to you, are these two datasets
>
> {
> {
> _:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
> }
> _:x {
> ex:a ex:b ex:c}
> }
> }
>
> ########
>
> {
> {
> _:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
> }
> _:x {
> ex:a ex:b ex:c}
> }
> }
>
> isomorphic? (yes, they are exactly the "same").
Yes, sure they are ( I think, according to anyone, right?)
Pat
>
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 14:46:52 UTC