W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2013

Re: RDF-ISSUE-140 (dataset-comparison): RDF Dataset Comparison (Ivan Herman) [RDF Concepts]

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:23:48 +0200
Cc: "'RDF Working Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D15493B3-316D-4C25-9D7C-3708B794BD42@w3.org>
To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
We had a long discussion some times ago and we concluded that graphs in a dataset share bnodes. As a consequence, I believe Gavin's statement seems to be the proper conclusion...

Ivan

 
On Aug 9, 2013, at 09:24 , "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Friday, August 09, 2013 12:20 AM, Gavin Carothers wrote:
>> For clarity
>> 
>> {
>>  {
>>    _:y rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
>>  }
>>  _:y {
>>    ex:a ex:b ex:c}
>>  }
>> }
>> ########
>> 
>> {
>>  {
>>    _:x rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
>>  }
>>  _:x {
>>    ex:a ex:b ex:c}
>>  }
>> }
>> 
>> MUST be isomorphic if we expect to have test cases for parsing
>> datasets.
> 
> Gavin, could you please explain why!? And also why the first dataset isn't isomorphic to
> 
> {
>  {
>    _:y rdf:type ex:graphsIlike .
>  }
>  _:x {
>    ex:a ex:b ex:c}
>  }
> }
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Markus
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 09:24:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:31 UTC