W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2013

Re: More clearly warn that "generalized RDF" is non-standard

From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 09:08:25 +0100
Message-ID: <51FF5D79.2060907@apache.org>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
CC: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 02/08/13 17:50, David Wood wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
>
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 12:42, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> (why is this discussed on "comments"?)
>
> It shouldn't have been.  My fault.
>
>
>>
>> JSON-LD does not allowed the full range of "generalized RDF".
>
>
> Does any existing spec or implementation?

I don't know of one that has literals-as-predicates, which is not to say 
there aren't any.

I'm sure many systems implement this at the core level because 
internally they simple store term/term/term, but it's not visible to 
applications.

Literals-as-graph-names (which is in the original N-quads BTW) came up 
as a question recently:

http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/23833/formulate-sparql-query-upon-n-quads

dates/datetime for the quad label

	Andy

> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
Received on Monday, 5 August 2013 08:08:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:31 UTC