- From: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:15:32 -0700
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
The agenda item related to Concepts is a bit sparse. I see: 1/ ISSUE-107: Revised definition of blank nodes http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/107 with a potential resolution of accepting the solution currently in Semantics and making minimal changes to Concepts to align it with the treatment in Semantics. This roughly means that blank nodes can be common between different RDF graphs, that Semantics is completely neutral with respect to this issue, and that Concepts discusses the situation. 2/ ISSUE-109: What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/109 with a potential resolution of accepting the solution currently in Semantics and noting the solution in Concepts. This means that ill-typed literals do not denote and thus any triple containing an ill-typed literal has no model. 3/ ISSUE-118: Simplifying datatype semantics http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/118 with a potential resolution of accepting the solution currently in Semantics and modifying the discussion of datatypes in Concepts. The solution is roughly that datatype maps are no longer part of the Semantics; instead the link between a datatype IRI and the datatype itself is made only in interpretations. peter On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The agenda for Wednesday, 17 April, is available at: > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.04.17 > > We *might* be using Calliflower instead of Zakim for this meeting. I will send subsequent email if we confirm the change. Please watch for that. > > Please volunteer if you can scribe. Thanks. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > >
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 19:15:59 UTC