Re: progress on open issues related to actual definition of RDF

Hi Peter,

I will add an agendum for next week.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Apr 10, 2013, at 12:06, Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> It would be very nice to make some progress on the open issues that relate to the definition of RDF, or at least to have some discussion of these issues.
> 
> I see three such issues:
> 
> 107 blank nodes
> 109 ill-typed literals
> 118 datatypes
> 
> peter
>