- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:46:38 +0100
- To: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Personal reply http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2013Apr/0002.html Mentions overlap with Turtle. Andy On 09/04/13 18:22, David Wood wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you for your comments. However, unless I misunderstand, I believe > your comments are directed to the SPARQL Working Group [1] and not to > the RDF Working Group. If so, your email should go to > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org <mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Main_Page > > > On Apr 9, 2013, at 13:00, Thomas Visel <TVisel@algebraixdata.com > <mailto:TVisel@algebraixdata.com>> wrote: > >> Gentlemen, >> While verifying our implementation of Sparql, I have encountered what >> several suspected problems in the grammar.
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 19:47:09 UTC