- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:58:57 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: 'W3C RDF WG' <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 04/01/2013 05:38 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Could we reserve such a URL for the JSON-LD test suite? Sure. > Maybe > http://www.w3.org/2013/json-ld-tests Sounds okay to me. Or should we do 2013/json-ld/test-suite ? Manu? > which just forwards to > http://json-ld.org/test-suite/ for the time being. Is proxying okay instead of forwarding? It'll be a good test of any relative and/or absolute URLs. :-) Actually, thinking about that, we probably want http://www.w3.org/2013/json-ld-tests/ (note the trailing slash) assuming the tests go in that directory. I don't actually see where the tests are on json-ld.org.... - s > > Cheers, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] >> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 10:47 PM >> To: Gregg Kellogg >> Cc: W3C RDF WG >> Subject: Re: turtle test suite? >> >> On 04/01/2013 03:44 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >>> According to last week's minutes (I wasn't there),\ >> Yeah, I was .... >>> the test suite should be mirrored to >> <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleCRtests/>, >> >> Or someone where, one can hope, reflecting the fact that this is >> actually the Turtle Test Suite, not just the "CR tests". >> >>> but that hasn't happened yet, apparently. >> Nor has the wiki page been updated. Yeah, I'm just trying to nag >> people about this. >> >> -- Sandro >> >>> They are in Mercurial at >> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl>, and >> will be tagged at some point, so they don't change. >>> Gregg Kellogg >>> gregg@greggkellogg.net >>> >>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I still can't find the Turtle test suite. The top Google result >> remains http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Test_Suite which is >> still not inspiring confidence. >>>> Hypothetically, if you were looking to see if there was a turtle >> test for parsing a float like 1.9999999999999999999 where and how would >> you look? >>>> -- Sandro >>>> >>>> > >
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 21:59:05 UTC