public-rdf-wg@w3.org from November 2012 by date

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

• review of RDF Concepts Peter Patel-Schneider
• Minutes for 28 November Gregg Kellogg
• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Alex Hall
• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Steve Harris
• Late Schreiber, A.T.
• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Ivan Herman
• Review of rdf11-concepts ED Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Yves Raimond

Tuesday, 27 November 2012

• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon David Wood
• Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon Guus Schreiber
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 27th 2012 Manu Sporny
• Review of JSON-LD API by WebIDL/JavaScript API expert Manu Sporny
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-20 Manu Sporny

Sunday, 25 November 2012

• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Nathan

Saturday, 24 November 2012

• Re: Sloppy inference rules David Wood
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Dan Brickley
• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes

Friday, 23 November 2012

• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Antoine Zimmermann

Thursday, 22 November 2012

• Re: Possible test case for turtle? Andy Seaborne

Monday, 19 November 2012

• Re: [Moderator Action] Sloppy inference rules Tim Berners-Lee

Thursday, 22 November 2012

• Re: Possible test case for turtle? Ivan Herman
• Re: Possible test case for turtle? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Possible test case for turtle? Ivan Herman
• Possible test case for turtle? Ivan Herman
• Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time Richard Cyganiak
• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time Nathan
• Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Jan Wielemaker
• Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time Nathan
• Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 21 November 2012

• A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Andy Seaborne
• Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time Gavin Carothers
• 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time Nathan
• RDF Concepts draft ready; overview of open issues Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Use http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context instead of describedby link relation Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Steve Harris
• regrets for the telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Thomas Baker
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Thomas Baker

Tuesday, 20 November 2012

• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Alex Hall
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov David Wood
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Thomas Baker
• Re: B-scopes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts] Thomas Baker
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 20th 2012 Manu Sporny
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-13 Manu Sporny
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes

Monday, 19 November 2012

• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Gavin Carothers
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Gregg Kellogg
• Re: B-scopes Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Jan Wielemaker
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Pat Hayes
• Re: B-scopes Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 18 November 2012

• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Ivan Herman
• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: B-scopes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle Ivan Herman
• Re: B-scopes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Pat Hayes

Saturday, 17 November 2012

• Rollup EARL report for Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Ivan Herman
• Re: B-scopes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pat Hayes
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Pat Hayes
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Pat Hayes
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Pat Hayes

Friday, 16 November 2012

• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• [All] Agenda for 21 Nov David Wood
• Re: B-scopes Alex Hall
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Ivan Herman
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Ivan Herman
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Ivan Herman
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Fwd: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives Andy Seaborne
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Pierre-Antoine Champin

Thursday, 15 November 2012

• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pat Hayes
• Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Pat Hayes
• Re: B-scopes Pat Hayes
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Gavin Carothers
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Richard Cyganiak
• Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Gavin Carothers
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Turtle test suite -- actions completed Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 14 November 2012

• Re: B-scopes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• RE: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Markus Lanthaler
• Re: B-scopes Pat Hayes
• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: B-scopes Pat Hayes
• Re: B-scopes Pat Hayes
• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Andy Seaborne
• RE: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: B-scopes Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: B-scopes Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts] Andy Seaborne
• Re: B-scopes Andy Seaborne
• B-scopes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 13 November 2012

• Intent to close ISSUE-166 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012 Manu Sporny
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012 Manu Sporny
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics] Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Antoine Zimmermann

Monday, 12 November 2012

• No Telecon Wednesday due to ISWC David Wood
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics] Ivan Herman
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Steve Harris
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Proposing some informative Notes for deletion Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics] Pat Hayes
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? David Wood
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Sandro Hawke
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Nathan
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Nathan
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Pat Hayes
• Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Pat Hayes

Sunday, 11 November 2012

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Turtle - Collections Example sanity check Nathan

Saturday, 10 November 2012

• Re: Where is the Turtle editor's draft? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Where is the Turtle editor's draft? Sandro Hawke
• Re: Where is the Turtle editor's draft? David Wood
• Re: OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Richard Cyganiak
• Where is the Turtle editor's draft? Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec Richard Cyganiak
• OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Intent to close issues 125 and 192 Gregg Kellogg
• Intent to close issues 125 and 192 Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 9 November 2012

• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Nathan
• RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• [Concepts] Proposing some informative Notes for deletion Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as �??g-box�??? [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Dan Brickley
• RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) Richard Cyganiak
• RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 8 November 2012

• Ill-typed vs. inconsistent? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Pat Hayes
• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Ivan Herman
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-107 (blank-node-definition): Definition of blank nodes (editorial-ish) [RDF Concepts] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] Ivan Herman
• [ALL] Minutes of November 7 2012 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• New abstract for RDF Concepts Richard Cyganiak
• RDF-ISSUE-107 (blank-node-definition): Definition of blank nodes (editorial-ish) [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] Ivan Herman
• RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Ivan Herman
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Ivan Herman
• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing Ivan Herman
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Steve Harris
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Richard Cyganiak
• RE: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Andy Seaborne
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Nathan
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Markus Lanthaler
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Antoine Zimmermann
• RDF-ISSUE-104 (concept-notes): Too many informative Notes in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96? Antoine Zimmermann
• Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-84: proposed solution Pat Hayes
• Re: Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96? Ivan Herman
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-06 Manu Sporny
• Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov David Wood
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing Antoine Zimmermann
• ISSUE-84: proposed solution Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED Gregg Kellogg
• Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov Pat Hayes
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov Guus Schreiber
• Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Sloppy inference rules William Waites
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• ISSUE-85: Update RDF Semantics to distinguish between the identity of values and the (numeric) equality of values to be in line with XSD 1.1 Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Sloppy inference rules Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Nathan
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Steve Harris
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Steve Harris
• Some informative edits in the Concepts ED Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Gregg Kellogg

Monday, 5 November 2012

• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012 Manu Sporny
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Steve Harris
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012 François Daoust
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012 Manu Sporny
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 4 November 2012

• Re: TriG and default graphs Ivan Mikhailov
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 3 November 2012

• Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 2 November 2012

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Andy Seaborne
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 1 November 2012

• Re: Sloppy inference rules Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Sloppy inference rules Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Pat Hayes
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] Kingsley Idehen
• RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Sloppy inference rules Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Sloppy inference rules David Wood
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Ivan Herman
• RE: Sloppy inference rules Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Turtle syn-prefix-06.ttl problem Andy Seaborne
• Re: Moving rdf:Seq and friends to RDF/XML (was: Re: Minutes of RDF-WG F2F, Day 2) Ivan Herman
• Re: Sloppy inference rules Ivan Herman
• Turtle syn-prefix-06.ttl problem Gregg Kellogg

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:45:30 UTC