public-rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2012 by date

Thursday, 28 June 2012

• Re: Agenda 27 June telecon Antoine Zimmermann

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

• JSON-LD FPWD documents Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-06-26 Manu Sporny
• Re: Agenda 27 June telecon Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 27 June telecon Scott Bauer
• Agenda 27 June telecon Guus Schreiber

Monday, 25 June 2012

• Fwd: Re: [json-ld.org] RDF WG Review: Andy Seaborne (#135) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review: JSON-LD Syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review: JSON-LD Syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review: JSON-LD syntax Manu Sporny
• Re: Review: JSON-LD Syntax Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 24 June 2012

• Re: Review: JSON-LD syntax Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Review: JSON-LD syntax Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Review: JSON-LD syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review: JSON-LD syntax Gavin Carothers

Saturday, 23 June 2012

• Agenda: Linked JSON Telecon - Tuesday, June 26th 2012 Manu Sporny
• Re: Review: JSON-LD syntax Manu Sporny

Friday, 22 June 2012

• Re: Turtle LC Draft Gavin Carothers
• Re: Turtle LC Draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Turtle LC Draft Gavin Carothers
• Re: Turtle LC Draft Ivan Herman

Thursday, 21 June 2012

• Turtle LC Draft Gavin Carothers

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

• Re: ericP's review of JSON-LD Syntax (just a start) Gregg Kellogg
• Rewrite for Turtle rule 7 Andy Seaborne
• Minutes of telecon 6/20/2012 Charles Greer
• ISSUE-92: Mention RDF in the JSON-LD Syntax Introduction. RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

• Re: Review: JSON-LD Syntax Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Review: JSON-LD syntax Pierre-Antoine Champin
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-06-19 Manu Sporny
• Re: [Moderator Action] comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) David Wood
• Introduction to Linked Data and JSON-LD Manu Sporny

Monday, 18 June 2012

• Re: Agenda for 20 June 2012 Pat Hayes
• Agenda for 20 June 2012 David Wood
• ericP's review of JSON-LD Syntax (just a start) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review: JSON-LD Syntax Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 17 June 2012

• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Pat Hayes
• Review: JSON-LD Syntax Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 16 June 2012

• Re: simplified patches against last night's grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: simplified patches against last night's grammar Gregg Kellogg
• Re: simplified patches against last night's grammar Gavin Carothers
• Re: simplified patches against last night's grammar Gavin Carothers
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement David Wood

Thursday, 14 June 2012

• Re: [Moderator Action] comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 15 June 2012

• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Gavin Carothers
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Manu Sporny
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• JSON-LD Comments Nathan
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Ivan Herman
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Andy Seaborne
• Fwd: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Ivan Herman
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Ivan Herman
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Ivan Herman
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Andy Seaborne
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Andy Seaborne
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Manu Sporny

Thursday, 14 June 2012

• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement Gregg Kellogg
• SPARQL and Turtle Prefix Placement David Wood
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Ivan Herman
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) David Wood
• comments/questions on JSON-LD spec (but _not_ for the CG->WG transition!) Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-158 Turtle review Pierre-Antoine Champin

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

• Re: ACTION-158 Turtle review Gavin Carothers
• Re: Turtle and decimals Gavin Carothers
• Minutes of the telecon 2012-06-13 Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Mini comment on concepts Pat Hayes
• "Relative IRIs" section in the Turtle document Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: PN_LOCAL_ESC Gavin Carothers
• PN_LOCAL_ESC Andy Seaborne
• Agenda for 13 June 2012 David Wood
• agenda still missing Guus Schreiber
• ACTION-158 Turtle review Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Mini comment on concepts Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

• Turtle and decimals Andy Seaborne
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-06-12 Manu Sporny

Monday, 11 June 2012

• Agenda: Linked JSON Telecon - Tuesday, June 12th 2012 Manu Sporny
• JSON-LD Syntax and API updated Manu Sporny

Saturday, 9 June 2012

• Re: rdf:value instead bibo:content Pat Hayes

Friday, 8 June 2012

• Re: dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web Richard Cyganiak
• Re: dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web Richard Cyganiak
• Re: dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdf:value instead bibo:content Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdf:value instead bibo:content Steve Harris
• Re: rdf:value instead bibo:content Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdf:value instead bibo:content Steve Harris
• (Meta) Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Ivan Herman
• Re: dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web Pat Hayes
• Re: dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web Sandro Hawke
• Re: rdf:value instead bibo:content Richard Cyganiak
• Re: n-quads & Turtle Levels Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 6 June 2012

• Re: The entailment rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content Dan Brickley
• Re: Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fwd: rdf:value instead bibo:content Guus Schreiber
• Reminder: no telecon today Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-06-05 Manu Sporny
• New RDF Concepts WD online Richard Cyganiak

Friday, 1 June 2012

• Re: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD Ivan Herman
• Re: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD David Wood
• Re: Introduction David Wood
• Linked Data Patterns Book - chapter 5 - Data Management Patterns Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

• Introduction Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 1 June 2012

• Re: Slides for SemTech presentation on JSON-LD Gregg Kellogg

Last message date: Thursday, 28 June 2012 10:08:38 UTC